|
Post by lenwe on Jul 8, 2009 14:45:53 GMT -5
vote, I'm not voting undecided
|
|
|
Post by lenwe on Jul 8, 2009 14:53:25 GMT -5
my thoughts:
Two kills is safe, higher chance of killing priest.
Killing L + possible angels would be awesome to if both angels are protecting him. but what if angels protect the priest? or the extra person we would kill was the priest. This one is more risky.
|
|
|
Post by lenwe on Jul 8, 2009 15:01:27 GMT -5
ok, I'm voting two kills I don't want to risk it.
|
|
|
Post by haemoglobin on Jul 8, 2009 15:05:14 GMT -5
ok, I'm voting two kills I don't want to risk it. #2
|
|
|
Post by mrbabyhands on Jul 8, 2009 15:05:59 GMT -5
I think bomb L might be better. I say we are guaranteed at LEAST 1 angel protecting him. This would take out two important players, regardless of role. It might cast more doubt onto BC if L died in such a seemingly drastic way.
I also don't think the medics know who the Priest is. They are historically dumb. I think its a better chance they protect someone they trust, rather than someone they are hoping for.
With L's analysis and play he can be almost assured innocent, someone worth keeping alive.
Also I think these analysis by BC are kind of unfortunate BS. Pledges don't get clues while fog is intact if I am not mistaken.
So with that, I vote for bomb L + Possible angel(s) kill(s).
|
|
|
Post by lenwe on Jul 8, 2009 15:08:09 GMT -5
good point mbh, I might change my vote
|
|
|
Post by lenwe on Jul 8, 2009 15:15:10 GMT -5
I'm posting this in case araav was priest so that we can bash Plexa, hehe:
[15:12] <SinnerG> if for some reason Araav was the priest [15:12] <SinnerG> we are fucked anyway [15:12] <SinnerG> becuase araav clues don't apply to caller [15:12] <SinnerG> so how are we supposed to consider him? [15:13] <SinnerG> So off the principle of that switch out fucking the mafia to a ridiculous extent, I refuse to believe that Caller is priest. [15:13] <SinnerG> even though the zealot link is probably one of the strongest.
|
|
|
Post by mrbabyhands on Jul 8, 2009 15:21:52 GMT -5
Also if we take out both angels who cover L, MBH dies the next day anyway, so it wouldn't matter. He would get a day to release his behavior analysis. But hopefully it sucks ass for a change, or at least isn't as accurate, then we destroy the stable of their leadership.
|
|
|
Post by ktfmafia on Jul 8, 2009 15:25:46 GMT -5
I say we try the risk. We kind of need a break right now.
Unless someone has any idea who the priest is. Then change my vote to two kills. But I have no idea who it is.
|
|
|
Post by haemoglobin on Jul 8, 2009 15:28:26 GMT -5
I change my vote from two kills to L + possible angel
|
|
|
Post by lenwe on Jul 8, 2009 15:34:35 GMT -5
so its 1 vs 4 in favor of one hit to L
should we stick with this?
1.bockit 2.vx70GTOJudgexv 3.so no fek
use bomb: L
|
|
|
Post by raisinbrahms on Jul 8, 2009 15:36:08 GMT -5
no not bockit, caller is WAY stronger link to priest than Bockit. WAY WAY stronger. I mean araav/caller but you know what I mean also caller will be active and will provide good clue analysis.
|
|
|
Post by lenwe on Jul 8, 2009 15:37:37 GMT -5
I thought we ruled out caller..thats the reason I voted to lynch L+possible angels
|
|
|
Post by lenwe on Jul 8, 2009 15:38:07 GMT -5
so:
1.caller 2.vx70GTOJudgexv 3.so no fek
use bomb: L
|
|
|
Post by raisinbrahms on Jul 8, 2009 15:38:34 GMT -5
what??? why on earth did we rule out caller?
|
|